Nike and Skechers reconcile! Three patent disputes that lasted for five years come to an end
According to relevant media reports, on November 23, 2021 local time, Nike and Skechers, two well-known sports brand companies in the United States, reached an unanimous settlement agreement on three patent lawsuits. It is understood that on November 16, the two companies, Nike and Skechers, under the witness of Judge James Holman, reached a settlement agreement. After the settlement agreement is finalized uabat , the two parties will apply for dismissal of the lawsuit.
The conclusion of the settlement agreement uabats marks the end of a court dispute between Nike and Skechers for trademark infringement claims for Skechers for several years.
The dispute between Nike and Skechers dates back to January 2016. At the beginning, Nike sued Skechers, claiming that the Burst brand of Skechers, Flex Appeal for women, Flex Advantage for men, and Skech Appeal for girls And several shoes such as uabat the boy's Flex Advantage contain a number of design elements that infringe Nike's patents.
Faced with Nike’s prosecution, Skechers requested the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to review the patentability of several Nike designs; Skechers believed uabat that all eight patents involved in Nike’s suit were invalid. However, PTAB rejected Skechers' request.
In September 2019, Nike sued Skechers again, claiming that Skechers produced "Skechers version of Nike shoes." In this lawsuit, Nike focused on the uabats Air Max 270 and VaporMax shoes. Popular design; In addition, Nike also claimed that Skechers is suspected of carrying out a "Skecherization" strategy of blatant plagiarism, that is, Skechers draws inspiration from competitors' products.
One month later, in October 2019, Nike once again filed a new round of lawsuits against Skechers, claiming that Skech-Air Jumpin'Dots and Mega uabats sneakers are suspected of infringing on the utility of Nike footwear cushioning. Patented technology. It is reported that this cushioning-related technology includes two features, one is a liquid-filled pouch, and the other is a plurality of foam beads filling the shoe cavity.
After five years of long-term seesaw, the five-year court dispute between the two sports brands finally came to an end because of the settlement agreement. The two brands uabats reached a settlement after five years of dispute, no matter what agreement was reached in the settlement between the two brands. On the whole, Skechers can be regarded as relieved of this burden. In any case, on the surface, Nike and Skechers' reconciliation was a win-win situation for both parties.
0 Comments